The many paradoxical 'definitions' of the Real, often quite reminisent of the contraditictory ways of designating God in Pseudo-Dionysius's Divine Names,are so many ways to try to get at the idea of a fundamental self-contradiction at the very heart of existence
The contradictory nature of the Real's relationship to the symbolic order is perhaps the most revealing 'definition' in this context
On the one hand, the Real represents the evasive remainder that the symbolic order can never
'catch'and contain in its attempt to ground the social reality in the Real - it's what the symbolic
somehow never manages to reach
On the other hands, the Real is the fundarmental contradiction at the heart symbolic order, actively undermining it - the problem is not that we can't reach it,but that it's all
too close
The ideological fantasy that underlies our social reality is a necessarily failed attempt
simultaneously to contain and to evade the traumatic antagonism of the Real.
ÁöÁ§°ú ½ÅÇÐÀ̶ó´Â Ã¥Áß ideology critique ¿¡ ³ª¿À´Â ºÎºÐÀε¥
¿©±â¼ Çì°ÖÀÇ º¯Áõ¹ýÀû »çÀ¯ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¼³¸íÇÏ¸é¼ µð¿À´Ï¼Ò½ºÀÇ À̾߱⸦ ÀοëÇϳ׿ä
µð¿À´Ï¼Ò½º À̾߱⸦ ¸ð¸£°í ¿µ¾î½Ç·ÂÀÌ ¾ÈµÇ´Ï È¥ÀÚ¼ °³³äÇؼ®ÀÌ ¾ÈµÇ¿ä Èæ...
ÀÌ·²¶© Çб³ ¶§ ´Ü¾î¿Ü¿ì±â ½È°í Àç¹Ì¾ø¾î¼ ¿µ¾î°øºÎ¸¦ ¸Ö¸®Çß´ø °ÍÀÌ µÎ°íµÎ°í ÈÄȸ½º·´½À´Ï´Ù
¼¼±â¿¬ ȸ¿ø´Ôµé²² µµ¿ò ºÎŹÇØ¿ä !!