À̸§ : ¿À´ÃÇÏ·ç ³¯Â¥ : 2005-11-27 10:06:28 (IP : 69.223.158.209) Á¶È¸ : 14 ȨÆäÀÌÁö : http://
³»°¡ ¾Æħ¿¡ Ã¥À» ¹Þ¾ÒÀ» ¶§¸¸ ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ, ±× Ã¥ÀÇ ³»¿ë»ó big noise¶ó´Â ´Ü¾î´Â ¾ð±ÞµÇ¾î ÀÖÀ¸³ª, big bangÀ¸·Î Á¤ÀÇÇϱ⿡´Â ¹«¸®°¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í »ý°¢Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ¿Ö³ÄÇϸé, ºò¹ð ÀÌ·ÐÀº Fred Hoyle ±³¼ö°¡ º¸¿ÏÇÏ¿© Á¦½ÃÇÑ ¸»À̱⠶§¹®ÀÌÁÒ. ±×·¡¼ ºò¹ð ÀÌ·ÐÀ» ¸»ÇÒ ¶§´Â big noise¶ó´Â ¸»À» Çؼ´Â ¾ÈµÈ´Ù°í »ý°¢Çß°í ±×·¸°Ô ¹Ï¾î¿ÔÁÒ. ÇÏÁö¸¸, º¸´Ù ºÐ¸íÇÏ°Ô Çϱâ À§Çؼ ½É±Ô¼ºÀÌ ¸»ÇÑ ±× Ã¥ÀÇ ÀúÀÚ Michael Macrone¿¡°Ô e-mailÀ» º¸³Â°í ¾Æ·¡¿Í °°Àº ´äº¯À» ¹Þ¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ºÐÀÇ ÀÇ°ß¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¾î¶»°Ô Á¤ÀǸ¦ ÇϳĿ¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÏ´Â ±º¿ä. µû¶ó¼ ºò³ë¸®Áî¶ó´Â ¸»°ú ÇÔ²² ºò¹ðÀ» ¼³¸íÇÒ ¼öµµ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ´Ü¼øÈ÷ ³ëÀÌÁî¶ó°í ºÒ·¯¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í Á¤ÀǸ¦ ³»¸°´Ù¸é ±×°ÍÀº À߸øµÈ °ÍÀÌ°í¿ä...
µû¶ó¼, ½É±Ô¼ºÀÌ ¾´ ºò¹ð(big noise)¶ó´Â ¸»Àº ¿Ç´Ù ¶ó´Â ¸»À̵ÇÁÒ.
¾à¼ÓÇÑ ´ë·Î ÀÌ°÷À» ¶°³ªÁÒ. ÇÏÁö¸¸, ½É±Ô¼º¾¾ ¾ÆÁ÷ ´ç½ÅÀÌ ¹àÇô¾ß ÇÒ 3°¡Áö°¡ ´õ ÀÖ¼ÒÀÌ´Ù. ³»°¡ ¾ø´õ¶óµµ ´ç½ÅÀÇ ¸í¿¹¸¦ °É°í ¹àÇôÁÖ±æ ¹Ù¶ó¿À.
From: "Michael Macrone" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Subject: Re: Question about the big bang
Chris,
This is really an issue of semantics -- that is, it depends on how you define "noise."
Idiomatically, "noise" requires air, through which sound waves travel. There was no air (or any kind of atmosphere) at the moment of the "big bang" -- just a super-dense collection of particles. And of course there were no ears, and no brains, to "hear" any waves, if there were any.
But people can define "noise" however they like, and if someone insists on defining it just so they can call something a "noise," there's really not much you can do.
Michael Macrone
>Dear, Michael Macrone, > > > >I am Chris Yeau from the Ohio State University. > >I am writing this latter related to "The Big Bang" which you wrote in book, "Eureka! What Archimedes Really Meant and 80 Other Key Idea Explained." > >Actually, I am disputing with a man, who is running a religion hospital, about "Whether we can say that 'big bang' is 'big noise' or not?" > >I think this is impossible because Fred Hoyle already have developed the Belgian priest, Georges Lemaitre, theory and improved his theory to "The big bang theory." > >However, the man has argued that we can call "big noise" instead of "the big bang" because big bang originated from big noise according to your book, page 139. > >Thus, I am looking for the answer. > >Please, give me some comments related to this controversy. > >Your comments would be the only clue to solve the endless argument. > > > >Sincerely, > > > >Chris Yeau
-----------
¿À´ÃÇÏ·ç À̸¸ ¹°·¯°©´Ï´Ù.
À̸§ : ¿À´ÃÇÏ·ç ³¯Â¥ : 2005-11-27 10:11:48 (IP : 69.223.158.209) Á¶È¸ : 13 ȨÆäÀÌÁö : http://
±×µ¿¾È º»ÀÇ ¾Æ´Ï°Ô ¿©·¯ºÐ²² ÇÇÇظ¦ ³¢ÃÆ´Ù¸é ¿ë¼¸¦ ±¸ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¿À´ÃÇÏ·ç´Â À̸¸ ÀÌ°÷À» ¶°³ª·Á°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
»ç½Ç ¶°³ª¾ß ÇÒ ¶§¸¦ ã°í ÀÖ¾ú´Âµ¥... Áö±ÝÀÌ Àû±âÀÎ °Í °°±º¿ä.
±×µ¿¾È Áñ°Å¿ü½À´Ï´Ù.
----------
½É±Ô¼ºÀÌ ¸»ÇÑ ÀÚ·á µµÂø
À̸§ : ¿À´ÃÇÏ·ç ³¯Â¥ : 2005-11-27 04:44:51 (IP : 164.107.57.85) Á¶È¸ : 13 ȨÆäÀÌÁö : http://
½É±Ô¼º¾¾, ¹æ±Ý ±× ÀڷḦ Àоú³×¿ä. ¤»¤»
±×·±µ¥ ¾Æ¹«¸® ã¾ÆºÁµµ "ºò¹ð(big noise)" ¶ó´Â °³³äÀº ¾ø´õ±º¿ä.
³»°¡ Àü¿¡ Hoyle ±³¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇؼ ¾ð±ÞÇßÀ» ¶§,
´ç½ÅÀÌ ¹º¸»ÀÎÁö Àß ¸ø¾Ë¾Æ µè´Â °Í °°´õ±º¿ä.
ÀÌ Ã¥ ¼µÎ 3° ÁÙ¿¡ º¸¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº ±ÛÀÌ ÀÖÁÒ.
In fact, when scientist Fred Hoyle coined its name, "big bang," he thought he was being funny.
±×¸®°í ³ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ Fred HoyleÀÇ ºò¹ð À̷п¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¸í¹®ÀÌ ³ª¿ÀÁÒ.
³»°¡ À§ÂÊ ¿¹¹®¿¡¼ coined ¶ó´Â ¸»À» ±½°Ô ÇØ ³õÀº ÀÌÀ¯¸¦ ¾Æ½Ã³ª¿ä? ¤»¤»
¹ø¿ªÆÇÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ» Å×´Ï ´Ù½Ã Àß ÀÐ¾î º¸½Ã±æ...
±×¸®°í ´ç½ÅÀÌ ¹àÇô¾ßÇÒ ÀÚ·á°¡ ÀÌ°Í ¸»°íµµ 3°¡Áö°¡ ´õ Àִµ¥
±×°Í¿¡ ´ëÇؼµµ ¹º°¡ º¯¸íÀÌ ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ»±î¿ä?
¾Æ´Ï¸é ³ªÇÑÅ× »ì¦ ºô¸é ³Ñ¾î°¡ ÁÙ ¼öµµ ÀÖÀ» °Í °°Àºµ¥...
|